Matter and anti-matter are equivalent opposites so while our atoms have negative electrons, anti-matter atoms have positive electrons. The laws of physics would be the same in an anti-matter universe but charge would be different. Why then don’t we see anti-matter around us? Did the big bang produce:
1) No anti-matter, for some unknown reason?
2) Matter and anti-matter equally, but the anti-matter in our universe is hidden?
3) Matter and anti-matter equally, but matter somehow overcame the anti-matter?
Physics dismisses the first option by its equations, and the second because no anti-matter meteors, planets, or stars have been seen, so it assumes the big bang made equal amounts of matter and anti-matter, then the former somehow overcame the latter to give our universe. That no evidence supports this view is called a mystery of physics:
“The lack of anti-matter is a deep mystery that cannot be explained using the Standard Model.” (Oerter,2006), p101.
What then does a processing model conclude? A clockwise rotation in a space is anti-clockwise from the other side (Figure 4.7a), but a first-up rotation on a surface stays that way however it is viewed (Figure 4.7b). If our universe began with one photon, then it had to first vibrate up or down on the surface of space, and either way, all its offspring would follow suit.
It follows that our universe became matter not anti-matter because the first photon chose to vibrate first up not down. Light then evolved into matter only, so the anti-matter the standard model tries to explain away never was. The first event of our universe made it matter and from then on, anti-matter was a path not taken. Nothing in our universe will ever explain why it is made of matter not anti-matter because that was decided when it began.