To us, mass and charge seem different but in processing terms they are sides of the same coin:
1. Mass is the net processing that runs, and
2. Charge is the net processing that doesn’t run.
Matter constantly overloads the network of space, then restarts at some point in its distribution. The processing that runs before the restart is mass, and the remainder is charge, which can be positive, negative, or neutral. The network passes on all processing, whether done or not, so the distribution of matter reflects both its mass and charge.
Gravity is based on the effect of mass. A large mass like the earth creates a massive distribution that weakens with distance, so the quantum field is stronger closer to earth. A local object then moves towards the earth because its matter restarts more often where the quantum field is stronger. The effect is slight, but even a slight asymmetry will move it over time. If gravity moves objects by biasing the quantum field around them, do charged objects attract or repel for a similar reason?
Recall that every point of space passes on its current processing before running any new processing received, so every quantum cycle has two phases:
1. Share: Pass on all current processing to its neighbors, which dilutes it, then,
2. Execute: Run any processing received, and if it overloads, request a server restart, where:
a. If the request is ignored, just carry on.
b. If the request is accepted, restart the server processing in a physical event.
The share phase then passes on all processing, not just that which causes mass but also the processing remainder of charge. These remainders don’t affect the gravity of small objects much, but between opposite charges they cancel, so the quantum cycle completes faster as the share phase has less processing to pass on. In contrast, between same-charge bodies the remainders add, so the cycle slows down because the share phase has more processing to pass on. Charged bodies then interact to make the quantum field between them run faster or slower.
Essentially, opposite charges speed up the field between them, so they restart more often there, as servers accept requests on a first-come first-served basis. They then move together, i.e. attract. Conversely, same charges slow down the field between them, so they restart less often there. They then move apart, i.e. repel. Charges then attract or repel by biasing the speed of the quantum field between them.
Charges then move other charges as gravity does, not by pushing or pulling, but by changing their space so they naturally move. Matter constantly trembles microscopically, so making it quiver more often one way will move it macroscopically. One object’s distribution can then affect another, even at a distance, but while gravity works by changing the quantum field strength, charge works by changing its speed.
Why then is charge much stronger than gravity for equivalent objects? In competitions where speed counts, like running, a team that is 5% faster than others wins all the races, not just a few more. Likewise on the quantum network, a slight speed increase on one side can have more than a slight effect, so charge is stronger than gravity because it biases speed not strength.
Gravity and charge move matter by biasing the quantum field differently, namely:
- Strength. Matter tends restart where the quantum field is stronger.
- Speed. Matter tends restart where the quantum field is faster.
Both effects arise because quantum processing spreads, so both reduce as an inverse square by Gauss’s law. However, if gravity and charge effects come from the quantum field, what about magnetism? Can the same quantum field explain it, and if so, why does it work differently?