Mass and charge are different to us but in this model, charge is a byproduct of mass, as:
1. Mass is the net processing that runs, and
2. Charge is the net processing remainder that doesn’t run.
Mass is a bump on the network of space that repeats, in a recurring overload, while charge is the processing remainder that is positive, negative, or neutral. Matter is processing that repeatedly restarts, so its mass and charge are constant properties that don’t change.
Gravity arises from the mass of matter, as the earth’s mass strengthens the quantum field closer to it so objects tremble more often towards it. The effect is slight, but even a slight asymmetry causes movement in our time. Yet the network passes on all processing, whether done or not, so the distribution of matter also includes its charge. Could charged objects then move each other by altering the quantum field, as gravity does?
Recall that every point of space passes on its current processing before receiving any new processing, so each network cycle has two phases:
1. Share: Pass on all current processing to its neighbors, which dilutes it, then,
2. Execute: Run any processing received, and if it overloads, request a server restart where:
a. If the request is ignored, just carry on.
b. If the request is accepted, restart the server processing in a physical event.
Note the share phase passes on all processing, not just of mass also of charge. Charge remainders don’t affect the gravity of small objects much, but between opposite charges they cancel, so network cycles complete faster there because the share phase has less processing to pass on. In contrast, between same-charge bodies the remainders add, so the cycle slows down because the share phase is passing on more processing. Charged bodies then interact to speed up or slow down the quantum field in the space between them.
Opposite charges speed up the field between them, so they restart there more often, as servers accept requests on a first-come first-served basis. They then move together, i.e. attract. Conversely, same charges restart less often in the slower field between them, so they move apart, i.e. repel. Charges then attract or repel by biasing the speed of the quantum field between them.
It follows that charges move each other not by pushing or pulling but by altering the quantum field between them to bias their natural tremble. Matter constantly moves microscopically so if it occurs more often one way, it moves macroscopically, but while gravity does this by changing the quantum field strength, charge does it by changing its speed.
Why is charge stronger than gravity for small objects? In competitions where speed counts, like running, a team that is 5% faster than others wins all the races, not just 5% more. A matter restart is also a winner-takes-all competition where speed counts, so a slight increase in speed can have a big effect. Charge effects are then stronger than gravity because they bias speed not strength.
Gravity and charge move matter by biasing the quantum field differently, namely:
- Strength. Matter tends restart more often where the field is stronger.
- Speed. Matter tends restart more often where the field is faster.
Both effects reduce as an inverse square by Gauss’s law, so the quantum field can explain gravity and charge, but what about magnetism?